On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 03:21:17PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > That seems like a good idea for memory usage, but I think this might > > also make the code much simpler, as that just requires fairly trivial > > quota_read and quota_write methods in the shmem code instead of new > > support for an in-memory quota file. > > You mean like the implementation in the v1 ? Having now found it: yes.
