Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: bail out unmapping after serving reference page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:12:38 -0800
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:05:41 +0800
>> Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > and a follow-up cleanup also attached.
>>
>> Please, never put more than one patches in an email - it is rather a
>> pain to manually unpick everything.
>>
>> > When unmapping given VM range, a couple of code duplicate, such as pte_page()
>> > and huge_pte_none(), so a cleanup needed to compact them together.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c  Thu Feb 23 20:13:06 2012
>> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c  Thu Feb 23 20:30:16 2012
>> > @@ -2245,16 +2245,23 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_ar
>> >             if (huge_pmd_unshare(mm, &address, ptep))
>> >                     continue;
>> >
>> > +           pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>> > +           if (huge_pte_none(pte))
>> > +                   continue;
>> > +
>> > +           /*
>> > +            * HWPoisoned hugepage is already unmapped and dropped reference
>> > +            */
>> > +           if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte)))
>> > +                   continue;
>> > +
>> > +           page = pte_page(pte);
>> >             /*
>> >              * If a reference page is supplied, it is because a specific
>> >              * page is being unmapped, not a range. Ensure the page we
>> >              * are about to unmap is the actual page of interest.
>> >              */
>> >             if (ref_page) {
>> > -                   pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
>> > -                   if (huge_pte_none(pte))
>> > -                           continue;
>> > -                   page = pte_page(pte);
>> >                     if (page != ref_page)
>> >                             continue;
>> >
>> > @@ -2267,16 +2274,6 @@ void __unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_ar
>> >             }
>> >
>> >             pte = huge_ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
>> > -           if (huge_pte_none(pte))
>> > -                   continue;
>> > -
>> > -           /*
>> > -            * HWPoisoned hugepage is already unmapped and dropped reference
>> > -            */
>> > -           if (unlikely(is_hugetlb_entry_hwpoisoned(pte)))
>> > -                   continue;
>> > -
>> > -           page = pte_page(pte);
>> >             if (pte_dirty(pte))
>> >                     set_page_dirty(page);
>> >             list_add(&page->lru, &page_list);
>>
>> This changes behaviour when ref_page refers to a hwpoisoned page.
>
> Respond, please?

First say sorry to you, Andrew.

The comment says, HWPoisoned hugepage is already unmapped;
and even if ref_page == HWPoisoned page, it is not added onto
page_list and no page_remove_rmap() is issued for it, so we end
up with no behavior change.

Thanks
-hd

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]