Re: [PATCH v3] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: remap head page to newly allocated page

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> On Nov 10, 2022, at 18:10, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On 10/11/2022 03:28, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 2022, at 04:06, Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Today with `hugetlb_free_vmemmap=on` the struct page memory that is freed
>>> back to page allocator is as following: for a 2M hugetlb page it will reuse
>>> the first 4K vmemmap page to remap the remaining 7 vmemmap pages, and for a
>>> 1G hugetlb it will remap the remaining 4095 vmemmap pages. Essentially,
>>> that means that it breaks the first 4K of a potentially contiguous chunk of
>>> memory of 32K (for 2M hugetlb pages) or 16M (for 1G hugetlb pages). For
>>> this reason the memory that it's free back to page allocator cannot be used
>>> for hugetlb to allocate huge pages of the same size, but rather only of a
>>> smaller huge page size:
>>> 
>>> Trying to assign a 64G node to hugetlb (on a 128G 2node guest, each node
>>> having 64G):
>>> 
>>> * Before allocation:
>>> Free pages count per migrate type at order       0      1      2      3
>>> 4      5      6      7      8      9     10
>>> ...
>>> Node    0, zone   Normal, type      Movable    340    100     32     15
>>> 1      2      0      0      0      1  15558
>>> 
>>> $ echo 32768 > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>>> 31987
>>> 
>>> * After:
>>> 
>>> Node    0, zone   Normal, type      Movable  30893  32006  31515      7
>>> 0      0      0      0      0      0      0
>>> 
>>> Notice how the memory freed back are put back into 4K / 8K / 16K page
>>> pools. And it allocates a total of 31987 pages (63974M).
>>> 
>>> To fix this behaviour rather than remapping second vmemmap page (thus
>>> breaking the contiguous block of memory backing the struct pages)
>>> repopulate the first vmemmap page with a new one. We allocate and copy
>>> from the currently mapped vmemmap page, and then remap it later on.
>>> The same algorithm works if there's a pre initialized walk::reuse_page
>>> and the head page doesn't need to be skipped and instead we remap it
>>> when the @addr being changed is the @reuse_addr.
>>> 
>>> The new head page is allocated in vmemmap_remap_free() given that on
>>> restore there's no need for functional change. Note that, because right
>>> now one hugepage is remapped at a time, thus only one free 4K page at a
>>> time is needed to remap the head page. Should it fail to allocate said
>>> new page, it reuses the one that's already mapped just like before. As a
>>> result, for every 64G of contiguous hugepages it can give back 1G more
>>> of contiguous memory per 64G, while needing in total 128M new 4K pages
>>> (for 2M hugetlb) or 256k (for 1G hugetlb).
>>> 
>>> After the changes, try to assign a 64G node to hugetlb (on a 128G 2node
>>> guest, each node with 64G):
>>> 
>>> * Before allocation
>>> Free pages count per migrate type at order       0      1      2      3
>>> 4      5      6      7      8      9     10
>>> ...
>>> Node    0, zone   Normal, type      Movable      1      1      1      0
>>> 0      1      0      0      1      1  15564
>>> 
>>> $ echo 32768  > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>>> $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>>> 32394
>>> 
>>> * After:
>>> 
>>> Node    0, zone   Normal, type      Movable      0     50     97    108
>>> 96     81     70     46     18      0      0
>>> 
>>> In the example above, 407 more hugeltb 2M pages are allocated i.e. 814M out
>>> of the 32394 (64788M) allocated. So the memory freed back is indeed being
>>> used back in hugetlb and there's no massive order-0..order-2 pages
>>> accumulated unused.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> A nit below.
>> 
> Thanks
> 
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> Comments from Muchun:
>>> * Delete the comment above the tlb flush
>>> * Move the head vmemmap page copy into vmemmap_remap_free()
>>> * Add and del the new head page to the vmemmap_pages (to be freed
>>>  in case of error)
>>> * Move the remap of the head like the tail pages in vmemmap_remap_pte()
>>>  but special casing only when addr == reuse_Addr
>>> * Removes the PAGE_SIZE alignment check as the code has the assumption
>>>  that start/end are page-aligned (and VM_BUG_ON otherwise).
>>> * Adjusted commit message taking the above changes into account.
>>> ---
>>> mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>>> index 7898c2c75e35..f562b3f46410 100644
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
>>> @@ -203,12 +203,7 @@ static int vmemmap_remap_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>>> return ret;
>>> } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>>> 
>>> - /*
>>> - * We only change the mapping of the vmemmap virtual address range
>>> - * [@start + PAGE_SIZE, end), so we only need to flush the TLB which
>>> - * belongs to the range.
>>> - */
>>> - flush_tlb_kernel_range(start + PAGE_SIZE, end);
>>> + flush_tlb_kernel_range(start, end);
>>> 
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -244,9 +239,16 @@ static void vmemmap_remap_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
>>> * to the tail pages.
>>> */
>>> pgprot_t pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL_RO;
>>> - pte_t entry = mk_pte(walk->reuse_page, pgprot);
>>> struct page *page = pte_page(*pte);
>>> + pte_t entry;
>>> 
>>> + /* Remapping the head page requires r/w */
>>> + if (unlikely(addr == walk->reuse_addr)) {
>>> + pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL;
>>> + list_del(&walk->reuse_page->lru);
>> 
>> Maybe smp_wmb() should be inserted here to make sure the copied data is visible
>> before set_pte_at() like the commit 939de63d35dde45 does.
>> 
> 
> I've added the barrier and comment above the barrier as the copy is not
> immediately obvious where it takes place. See below snip as to what I added
> in v4:
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> index f562b3f46410..45e93a545dd7 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c
> @@ -246,6 +246,13 @@ static void vmemmap_remap_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
>        if (unlikely(addr == walk->reuse_addr)) {
>                pgprot = PAGE_KERNEL;
>                list_del(&walk->reuse_page->lru);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Makes sure that preceding stores to the page contents from
> +                * vmemmap_remap_free() become visible before the set_pte_at()
> +                * write.
> +                */
> +               smp_wmb();
>        }
> 
>        entry = mk_pte(walk->reuse_page, pgprot);

make sense to me.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux