(2012/03/20 0:33), Michal Hocko wrote: > On Mon 19-03-12 14:58:00, Glauber Costa wrote: >> On 03/19/2012 11:59 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >>> In order to encode pc->mem_cgroup and pc->flags to be in a word, >>> access function to pc->mem_cgroup is required. >>> >>> This patch replaces access to pc->mem_cgroup with >>> pc_to_mem_cgroup(pc) : pc->mem_cgroup >>> pc_set_mem_cgroup(pc, memcg) : pc->mem_cgroup = memcg >>> >>> Following patch will remove pc->mem_cgroup. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Kame, >> >> I can't see a reason not to merge this patch right now, regardless of >> the other ones. > > I am not so sure about that. The patch doesn't do much on its own and > reference to the "following patch" might be confusing. Does it actually > help to rush it now? Hm. it sounds I should post full series (removing RFC) and finish page cgroup diet all ASAP. I'll continue updates and tests. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>