Re: [RFC] AutoNUMA alpha6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



AA> Could you try my two trivial benchmarks I sent on lkml too?

I just got around to running your numa01 test on mainline, autonuma, and
numasched.  This is on a 2-socket, 6-cores-per-socket,
2-threads-per-core machine, with your test configured to run 24
threads. I also ran Peter's modified stream_d on all three as well, with
24 instances in parallel. I know it's already been pointed out that it's
not the ideal or end-all benchmark, but I figured it was still
worthwhile to see if the trend continued.

On your numa01 test:

  Autonuma is 22% faster than mainline
  Numasched is 42% faster than mainline

On Peter's modified stream_d test:

  Autonuma is 35% *slower* than mainline
  Numasched is 55% faster than mainline

I know that the "real" performance guys here are going to be posting
some numbers from more interesting benchmarks soon, but since nobody
had answered Andrea's question, I figured I'd do it.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]