On Nov 2, 2022, at 12:12 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> !! External Email
>
> commit b191f9b106ea ("mm: numa: preserve PTE write permissions across a
> NUMA hinting fault") added remembering write permissions using ordinary
> pte_write() for PROT_NONE mapped pages to avoid write faults when
> remapping the page !PROT_NONE on NUMA hinting faults.
>
[ snip ]
Here’s a very shallow reviewed with some minor points...
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
> mm/huge_memory.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> mm/ksm.c | 9 ++++-----
> mm/memory.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> mm/mprotect.c | 7 ++-----
> 5 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 25ff9a14a777..a0deeece5e87 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1975,6 +1975,8 @@ extern unsigned long move_page_tables(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> #define MM_CP_UFFD_WP_ALL (MM_CP_UFFD_WP | \
> MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE)
>
> +bool can_change_pte_writable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> + pte_t pte);
It might not be customary, but how about marking it as __pure?
> extern unsigned long change_protection(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long end, pgprot_t newprot,
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 2ad68e91896a..45abd27d75a0 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -1462,8 +1462,7 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> unsigned long haddr = vmf->address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
> int page_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> int target_nid, last_cpupid = (-1 & LAST_CPUPID_MASK);
> - bool migrated = false;
> - bool was_writable = pmd_savedwrite(oldpmd);
> + bool try_change_writable, migrated = false;
> int flags = 0;
>
> vmf->ptl = pmd_lock(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd);
> @@ -1472,13 +1471,22 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* See mprotect_fixup(). */
> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> + try_change_writable = vma_wants_writenotify(vma, vma->vm_page_prot);
> + else
> + try_change_writable = !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE);
Do you find it better to copy the code instead of extracting it to a
separate function?
> +
> pmd = pmd_modify(oldpmd, vma->vm_page_prot);
> page = vm_normal_page_pmd(vma, haddr, pmd);
> if (!page)
> goto out_map;
>
> /* See similar comment in do_numa_page for explanation */
> - if (!was_writable)
> + if (try_change_writable && !pmd_write(pmd) &&
> + can_change_pmd_writable(vma, vmf->address, pmd))
> + pmd = pmd_mkwrite(pmd);
> + if (!pmd_write(pmd))
> flags |= TNF_NO_GROUP;
>
> page_nid = page_to_nid(page);
> @@ -1523,8 +1531,12 @@ vm_fault_t do_huge_pmd_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> /* Restore the PMD */
> pmd = pmd_modify(oldpmd, vma->vm_page_prot);
> pmd = pmd_mkyoung(pmd);
> - if (was_writable)
> +
> + /* Similar to mprotect() protection updates, avoid write faults. */
> + if (try_change_writable && !pmd_write(pmd) &&
> + can_change_pmd_writable(vma, vmf->address, pmd))
Why do I have a deja-vu? :)
There must be a way to avoid the redundant code and specifically the call to
can_change_pmd_writable(), no?
> pmd = pmd_mkwrite(pmd);
> +
> set_pmd_at(vma->vm_mm, haddr, vmf->pmd, pmd);
> update_mmu_cache_pmd(vma, vmf->address, vmf->pmd);
> spin_unlock(vmf->ptl);
> @@ -1764,11 +1776,10 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> spinlock_t *ptl;
> pmd_t oldpmd, entry;
> - bool preserve_write;
> - int ret;
> bool prot_numa = cp_flags & MM_CP_PROT_NUMA;
> bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
> bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
> + int ret = 1;
>
> tlb_change_page_size(tlb, HPAGE_PMD_SIZE);
>
> @@ -1779,9 +1790,6 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> if (!ptl)
> return 0;
>
> - preserve_write = prot_numa && pmd_write(*pmd);
> - ret = 1;
> -
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_ENABLE_THP_MIGRATION
> if (is_swap_pmd(*pmd)) {
> swp_entry_t entry = pmd_to_swp_entry(*pmd);
> @@ -1861,8 +1869,6 @@ int change_huge_pmd(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> oldpmd = pmdp_invalidate_ad(vma, addr, pmd);
>
> entry = pmd_modify(oldpmd, newprot);
> - if (preserve_write)
> - entry = pmd_mk_savedwrite(entry);
> if (uffd_wp) {
> entry = pmd_wrprotect(entry);
> entry = pmd_mkuffd_wp(entry);
> diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
> index dc15c4a2a6ff..dd02780c387f 100644
> --- a/mm/ksm.c
> +++ b/mm/ksm.c
> @@ -1069,7 +1069,6 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
>
> anon_exclusive = PageAnonExclusive(page);
> if (pte_write(*pvmw.pte) || pte_dirty(*pvmw.pte) ||
> - (pte_protnone(*pvmw.pte) && pte_savedwrite(*pvmw.pte)) ||
Not related to your code, but it does not make me comfortable that PTE’s
status bits (which are volatile) are not accessed in this manner.
Especially since the PTE is later saved into orig_pte. It would feel safer
to do READ_ONCE(*pvmw.pte) and work on it (probably in a separate patch).
> anon_exclusive || mm_tlb_flush_pending(mm)) {
> pte_t entry;
>
> @@ -1107,11 +1106,11 @@ static int write_protect_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
>
> if (pte_dirty(entry))
> set_page_dirty(page);
> + entry = pte_mkclean(entry);
> +
> + if (pte_write(entry))
> + entry = pte_wrprotect(entry);
>
> - if (pte_protnone(entry))
> - entry = pte_mkclean(pte_clear_savedwrite(entry));
> - else
> - entry = pte_mkclean(pte_wrprotect(entry));
> set_pte_at_notify(mm, pvmw.address, pvmw.pte, entry);
> }
> *orig_pte = *pvmw.pte;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index c5599a9279b1..286c29ee3aba 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4672,12 +4672,12 @@ int numa_migrate_prep(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> + bool try_change_writable;
> struct page *page = NULL;
> int page_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> int last_cpupid;
> int target_nid;
> pte_t pte, old_pte;
> - bool was_writable = pte_savedwrite(vmf->orig_pte);
> int flags = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -4692,6 +4692,12 @@ static vm_fault_t do_numa_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* See mprotect_fixup(). */
> + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> + try_change_writable = vma_wants_writenotify(vma, vma->vm_page_prot);
> + else
> + try_change_writable = !!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE);
It really cannot be extracted into a separate function?
