Re: [PATCH 3/9] mm/hugetlb_cgroup: convert set_hugetlb_cgroup*() to folios

[Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/31/22 9:38 AM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 10/13/22 20:12, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > Allows __prep_new_huge_page() to operate on a folio by converting
> > set_hugetlb_cgroup*() to take in a folio.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -1758,19 +1758,21 @@ static void __prep_account_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> >   	h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> >   }
> >   
> > -static void __prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> > +static void __prep_new_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h, struct folio *folio)
> >   {
> > -	hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize(h, page);
> > -	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> > -	set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> > -	hugetlb_set_page_subpool(page, NULL);
> > -	set_hugetlb_cgroup(page, NULL);
> > -	set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(page, NULL);
> > +	hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize(h, &folio->page);
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&folio->lru);
> > +	folio->_folio_dtor = HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR;
> Seems like we should have a routine 'set_folio_dtor' that has the same
> functionality as set_compound_page_dtor.  Here, we loose the check for a
> valid DTOR value (although not terribly valuable).

I agree with the need for a 'set_folio_dtor' routine, I'll send out a 
patch for that as well.

> Not required for this patch, but something to note.
>
> > +	hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(folio, NULL);
> > +	set_hugetlb_cgroup(folio, NULL);
> > +	set_hugetlb_cgroup_rsvd(folio, NULL);
> >   }
> >   
> >   static void prep_new_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page, int nid)
> >   {
> > -	__prep_new_huge_page(h, page);
> > +	struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> > +
> > +	__prep_new_hugetlb_folio(h, folio);
> >   	spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> >   	__prep_account_new_huge_page(h, nid);
> >   	spin_unlock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > @@ -2731,8 +2733,10 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
> >   					struct list_head *list)
> >   {
> >   	gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
> > -	int nid = page_to_nid(old_page);
> > +	struct folio *old_folio = page_folio(old_page);
> > +	int nid = folio_nid(old_folio);
> >   	struct page *new_page;
> > +	struct folio *new_folio;
> >   	int ret = 0;
> >   
> >   	/*
> > @@ -2745,16 +2749,17 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
> >   	new_page = alloc_buddy_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL, NULL);
> >   	if (!new_page)
> >   		return -ENOMEM;
> > -	__prep_new_huge_page(h, new_page);
> > +	new_folio = page_folio(new_page);
> > +	__prep_new_hugetlb_folio(h, new_folio);
> >   
> >   retry:
> >   	spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> > -	if (!PageHuge(old_page)) {
> > +	if (!folio_test_hugetlb(old_folio)) {
> >   		/*
> >   		 * Freed from under us. Drop new_page too.
> >   		 */
> >   		goto free_new;
> > -	} else if (page_count(old_page)) {
> > +	} else if (folio_ref_count(old_folio)) {
> >   		/*
> >   		 * Someone has grabbed the page, try to isolate it here.
> >   		 * Fail with -EBUSY if not possible.
> > @@ -2763,7 +2768,7 @@ static int alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *old_page,
> >   		ret = isolate_hugetlb(old_page, list);
> >   		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
> >   		goto free_new;
> > -	} else if (!HPageFreed(old_page)) {
> > +	} else if (!folio_test_hugetlb(old_folio)) {
> Should that be?
> 	} else if (!folio_test_hugetlb_freed(old_folio)) {

Yes good catch, I will fix in a v2.

Thanks,
Sidhartha Kumar

>