Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> For the niche there's the
> numactl, cpusets, and all sort of bindings already. No need of more
> niche, that is pure kernel API pollution in my view, the niche has all
> its hard tools it needs already. 

Not quite, I've heard that some HPC people would very much like to relax
some of that hard binding because its just as big a pain for them as it
is for kvm.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]