Hi Rebecca, On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 12:00:06AM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I noticed that the memblock tree has been updated since I sent this > patch set. Do you want me to send an updated patch set applied on top of > the current tree? No need, the only actual conflict is in TODO, I'll fix it while applying. > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 01:34:07PM -0500, Rebecca Mckeever wrote: > > These patches add tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw(). There are two > > sets of tests: range tests and NUMA tests. The range tests use a normal > > (i.e., UMA) simulated physical memory and set the nid to NUMA_NO_NODE. The > > NUMA tests use a simulated physical memory that is set up with multiple > > NUMA nodes. Additionally, most of the NUMA tests set nid != NUMA_NO_NODE. > > > > For the range tests, the TEST_F_EXACT flag is used to run the same set of > > range tests used for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(). The NUMA tests have the > > same setup as the corresponding test for memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(), but > > several of the memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests fail to allocate > > memory in setups where the memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test would > > allocate memory. Also, some memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() tests drop the > > lower limit of the requested range in order to allocate within the > > requested node, but the same setup in a memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw() test > > allocates within the requested range. > > > > --- > > Changelog > > > > v1 -> v2 > > PATCH 0: > > - Add missing memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw to subject line > > > > v2 -> v3 > > Based on feedback from David Hildenbrand: > > PATCH 1: > > - alloc_nid_api.c, alloc_nid_api.h, common.h: > > + Add TEST_F_EXACT flag so that tests in alloc_nid_api.c can be run > > with that flag to test memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw() > > - alloc_exact_nid_api.c: > > + Update to run range tests in alloc_nid_api.c with TEST_F_EXACT flag > > instead of using a separate set of tests > > - alloc_nid_api.c: > > + Rename tests and other functions by removing "_try" so that the > > function names are general enough to refer to any of the > > memblock_alloc_*nid*() functions of the memblock API > > --- > > > > Rebecca Mckeever (5): > > memblock tests: introduce range tests for memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw > > memblock tests: add top-down NUMA tests for > > memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw > > memblock tests: add bottom-up NUMA tests for > > memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw > > memblock tests: add generic NUMA tests for > > memblock_alloc_exact_nid_raw > > memblock tests: remove completed TODO item > > > > tools/testing/memblock/Makefile | 2 +- > > tools/testing/memblock/TODO | 7 +- > > tools/testing/memblock/main.c | 2 + > > .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c | 1113 +++++++++++++++++ > > .../memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h | 25 + > > tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.c | 542 ++++---- > > tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_nid_api.h | 1 + > > tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 2 + > > 8 files changed, 1425 insertions(+), 269 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.c > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/memblock/tests/alloc_exact_nid_api.h > > > > -- > > 2.25.1 > > > Thanks, > Rebecca -- Sincerely yours, Mike.
