Re: [PATCH] mm/mmap: Fix memory leak in mmap_region()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2022/10/27 15:30, Liam Howlett wrote:
* Li Zetao <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx> [221026 21:55]:
There is a memory leak reported by kmemleak:

   unreferenced object 0xffff88817231ce40 (size 224):
     comm "mount.cifs", pid 19308, jiffies 4295917571 (age 405.880s)
     hex dump (first 32 bytes):
       00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
       60 c0 b2 00 81 88 ff ff 98 83 01 42 81 88 ff ff  `..........B....
     backtrace:
       [<ffffffff81936171>] __alloc_file+0x21/0x250
       [<ffffffff81937051>] alloc_empty_file+0x41/0xf0
       [<ffffffff81937159>] alloc_file+0x59/0x710
       [<ffffffff81937964>] alloc_file_pseudo+0x154/0x210
       [<ffffffff81741dbf>] __shmem_file_setup+0xff/0x2a0
       [<ffffffff817502cd>] shmem_zero_setup+0x8d/0x160
       [<ffffffff817cc1d5>] mmap_region+0x1075/0x19d0
       [<ffffffff817cd257>] do_mmap+0x727/0x1110
       [<ffffffff817518b2>] vm_mmap_pgoff+0x112/0x1e0
       [<ffffffff83adf955>] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
       [<ffffffff83c0006a>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0

The root cause was traced to an error handing path in mmap_region()
when arch_validate_flags() or mas_preallocate() fails. In the shared
anonymous mapping sence, vma will be setuped and mapped with a new
shared anonymous file via shmem_zero_setup(). So in this case, the
file resource needs to be released.

Fix it by calling fput(vma->vm_file) when arch_validate_flags() or
mas_preallocate() returns an error. And for the beauty of the code,
put fput() under mapping_unmap_writable().
It does look like the unrolling is in the wrong order in that section.

Fixes: d4af56c5c7c6 ("mm: start tracking VMAs with maple tree")
Fixes: c462ac288f2c ("mm: Introduce arch_validate_flags()")
Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/mmap.c | 10 +++++++---
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index e270057ed04e..8530195b3ec5 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2674,6 +2674,8 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
  		error = -EINVAL;
  		if (file)
  			goto close_and_free_vma;I will modify it in the second version
+		else if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
+			goto put_vma_file;
  		else
  			goto free_vma;
  	}
@@ -2682,6 +2684,8 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
  		error = -ENOMEM;
  		if (file)
  			goto close_and_free_vma;
+		else if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
+			goto put_vma_file;
  		else
  			goto free_vma;
  	}
I am not happy about this getting more complex as it already duplicates
too much code.

It's true that my modification would cause the code to further complicate. I will rework it in the

next version.

@@ -2746,13 +2750,13 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
  	if (vma->vm_ops && vma->vm_ops->close)
  		vma->vm_ops->close(vma);
  unmap_and_free_vma:
-	fput(vma->vm_file);
-	vma->vm_file = NULL;
-
  	/* Undo any partial mapping done by a device driver. */
  	unmap_region(mm, mas.tree, vma, prev, next, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
  	if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
Could we change the above if to "if (file && vm_flags & VM_SHARED)" and
jump to unmap_and_free_vma "if (vma->vm_file)"?  We could then drop your
new goto label. I still think the reodering is correct and worth while.

Or am I missing something?
Thanks for your constructive comments.
  		mapping_unmap_writable(file->f_mapping);
+put_vma_file:
+	fput(vma->vm_file);
+	vma->vm_file = NULL;
  free_vma:
  	vm_area_free(vma);
  unacct_error:
--
2.31.1

Regards,

Li Zetao





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux