Re: [PATCH 0/4] Get rid of iput() from flusher thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:02:24AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   this patch set changes writeback_sb_inodes() to avoid iput() which might
> be problematic (see patch 4 which tries to summarize our email discussions)
> for some filesystems.
> 
>   Patches 1 and 2 are trivial mostly unrelated fixes (Fengguang, can you can
> take these and merge them right away please?).

Sure, they have been tested in linux-next for some days.

> Patch 3 is a preparatory code
> reshuffle and patch 4 removes the __iget() / iput() from flusher thread.

These are pretty sane changes towards the right direction (in despite
of the complexities involved).

>   As a side note, your patches to offload writeback from kswapd to flusher
> thread then won't need iget/iput either if we pass page references as we talked
> so that should resolve most of the concerns.
> 
>   What do you think guys?

I appreciate the work a lot. Thank you for removing the major problem
with the patches on pageout writeback work :-)

Regards,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]