On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:05:19PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > +static int reclaimer_offset(void) > +{ > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != 1); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != 2); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGDEMOTE_DIRECT - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD != 1); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGDEMOTE_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD != 2); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSCAN_DIRECT - PGSCAN_KSWAPD != 1); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSCAN_KHUGEPAGED - PGSCAN_KSWAPD != 2); > + > + if (current_is_kswapd()) > + return 0; > + if (current_is_khugepaged()) > + return 2; > + return 1; > +} Would this be simpler as ... BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != PGDEMOTE_DIRECT - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD); BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != PGSCAN_DIRECT - PGSCAN_KSWAPD); BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != PGDEMOTE_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD); BUILD_BUG_ON(PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD != PGSCAN_KHUGEPAGED - PGDEMOTE_KSWAPD); if (current_is_kswapd()) return 0; if (current_is_khugepaged()) return PGSTEAL_KHUGEPAGED - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD; return PGSTEAL_DIRECT - PGSTEAL_KSWAPD; Not that I think we'd ever want to separate them, but it is perhaps a bit less magic?