Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mm: Use pte markers for swap errors

[Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 05:31:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > -#define  PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP  BIT(0)
> > -#define  PTE_MARKER_MASK     (PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP)
> > +#define  PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP			BIT(0)
> > +#define  PTE_MARKER_SWAP_ERROR			BIT(1)
> 
> I'd suggest to keep the term SWAPIN. An error happened during swapin, which
> is why the page is corrupted.

Sure thing.

-- 
Peter Xu