Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] mm: Use pte marker for swapin errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> This series uses the pte marker to replace the swapin error swap entry,
> then we safe one more swap entry.  A new pte marker bit is defined.
          ~~~~               ~~~~~
          save?              file?

It's good to save one swap file.  Thanks for your patch!  Please feel
free to add my

Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>

for the whole series.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> One thing worth mentioning: we need the pte marker to be always built to
> make sure it works like before, so I made an attempt in patch 1 to drop
> CONFIG_PTE_MARKER and always compile pte marker in.  Since pte markers are
> enabled in many distributions by default already, meanwhile the codeset is
> really small I assume it's fine.  But still I'm tagging with RFC for this
> initial version.
>
> Smoke tested on anonymous mem on a fake swap failure.  Please have a look,
> thanks.
>
> Peter Xu (2):
>   mm: Always compile in pte markers
>   mm: Use pte markers for swap errors
>
>  include/linux/swap.h    | 16 ++++----------
>  include/linux/swapops.h | 49 +++++++++--------------------------------
>  mm/Kconfig              |  7 ------
>  mm/memory.c             | 13 ++++++-----
>  mm/shmem.c              |  2 +-
>  mm/swapfile.c           |  2 +-
>  6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux