Let's stop breaking COW via a fake write fault and let's use
FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE instead. This avoids any wrong side effects of the fake
write fault, such as mapping the PTE writable and marking the pte
dirty/softdirty.
Consequently, we will no longer trigger a fake write fault and break COW
without any such side-effects.
Also, this fixes KSM interaction with userfaultfd-wp: when we have a KSM
page that's write-protected by userfaultfd, break_ksm()->handle_mm_fault()
will fail with VM_FAULT_SIGBUS and will simply return in break_ksm() with
0 instead of actually breaking COW.
For now, the KSM unmerge tests can trigger that:
$ sudo ./ksm_functional_tests
TAP version 13
1..3
# [RUN] test_unmerge
ok 1 Pages were unmerged
# [RUN] test_unmerge_discarded
ok 2 Pages were unmerged
# [RUN] test_unmerge_uffd_wp
not ok 3 Pages were unmerged
Bail out! 1 out of 3 tests failed
# Planned tests != run tests (2 != 3)
# Totals: pass:2 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
The warning in dmesg also indicates this wrong handling:
[ 230.096368] FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY missing 881
[ 230.100822] CPU: 1 PID: 1643 Comm: ksm-uffd-wp [...]
[ 230.110124] Hardware name: [...]
[ 230.117775] Call Trace:
[ 230.120227] <TASK>
[ 230.122334] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x5c
[ 230.126010] handle_userfault.cold+0x14/0x19
[ 230.130281] ? tlb_finish_mmu+0x65/0x170
[ 230.134207] ? uffd_wp_range+0x65/0xa0
[ 230.137959] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
[ 230.141972] ? do_wp_page+0x50/0x590
[ 230.145551] __handle_mm_fault+0x9f5/0xf50
[ 230.149652] ? mmput+0x1f/0x40
[ 230.152712] handle_mm_fault+0xb9/0x2a0
[ 230.156550] break_ksm+0x141/0x180
[ 230.159964] unmerge_ksm_pages+0x60/0x90
[ 230.163890] ksm_madvise+0x3c/0xb0
[ 230.167295] do_madvise.part.0+0x10c/0xeb0
[ 230.171396] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 230.175157] __x64_sys_madvise+0x5a/0x70
[ 230.179082] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x80
[ 230.182661] ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
[ 230.186413] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
This is primarily a fix for KSM+userfaultfd-wp, however, the fake write
fault was always questionable. As this fix is not easy to backport and it's
not very critical, let's not cc stable.
Fixes: 529b930b87d9 ("userfaultfd: wp: hook userfault handler to write protection fault")
Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/ksm.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index b884a22f3c3c..c6f58aa6e731 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -420,17 +420,15 @@ static inline bool ksm_test_exit(struct mm_struct *mm)
}
/*
- * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page: it's a stripped down
+ * We use break_ksm to break COW on a ksm page by triggering unsharing,
+ * such that the ksm page will get replaced by an exclusive anonymous page.
*
- * if (get_user_pages(addr, 1, FOLL_WRITE, &page, NULL) == 1)
- * put_page(page);
- *
- * but taking great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma,
+ * We take great care only to touch a ksm page, in a VM_MERGEABLE vma,
* in case the application has unmapped and remapped mm,addr meanwhile.
* Could a ksm page appear anywhere else? Actually yes, in a VM_PFNMAP
* mmap of /dev/mem, where we would not want to touch it.
*
- * FAULT_FLAG/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context
+ * FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE/FOLL_REMOTE are because we do this outside the context
* of the process that owns 'vma'. We also do not want to enforce
* protection keys here anyway.
*/
@@ -454,7 +452,7 @@ static int break_ksm(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr)
if (!ksm_page)
return 0;
ret = handle_mm_fault(vma, addr,
- FAULT_FLAG_WRITE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,
+ FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE | FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,
NULL);
} while (!(ret & (VM_FAULT_SIGBUS | VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV | VM_FAULT_OOM)));
/*
--
2.37.3
