Re: [PATCH] mm/gup: fix gup_pud_range() for dax

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 12:14 PM Saurabh Sengar
<ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: John Starks <jostarks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For dax pud, pud_huge() returns true on x86. So the function works as long
> as hugetlb is configured. However, dax doesn't depend on hugetlb.
> Commit 414fd080d125 ("mm/gup: fix gup_pmd_range() for dax") fixed
> devmap-backed huge PMDs, but missed devmap-backed huge PUDs. Fix this as
> well.
>
> Fixes: 414fd080d125 ("mm/gup: fix gup_pmd_range() for dax")
> Signed-off-by: John Starks <jostarks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/gup.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 05068d3d2557..9e07aa54a4cd 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ static int gup_pud_range(p4d_t *p4dp, p4d_t p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned lo
>                 next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
>                 if (unlikely(!pud_present(pud)))
>                         return 0;
> -               if (unlikely(pud_huge(pud))) {
> +               if (unlikely(pud_huge(pud) || pud_devmap(pud))) {

Perhaps s/pud_huge/pud_leaf/ ?

>                         if (!gup_huge_pud(pud, pudp, addr, next, flags,
>                                           pages, nr))
>                                 return 0;
> --
> 2.25.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux