On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:36:11 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:49:21AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > >Any updates on this series? Linus took an interest, so I went to sleep. It seems that a role reversal is in order ;) > > > I had sent "[PATCH v2 0/3] radix-tree: general iterator" February 10, there is no more updates after that. > > > I just checked v2 on top "next-20120314" -- looks like all ok. > > > > this was more a question to the MM maintainers if this is getting > > merged or if there were any further comments. > > I haven't studied the code at all - I'm afraid Konstantin is rather > more productive than I can keep up with, and other bugs and patches > appeared to be more urgent and important. I'll take a look. > And I made a patch for the > radix-tree test harness which akpm curates, to update its radix-tree.c > to Konstantin's: those tests ran perfectly on 64-bit and on 32-bit. > That patch to rtth appended below. Thanks. > (I do have, or expect to have once I study them, reservations about > his subsequent changes to radix-tree usage in mm/shmem.c; and even > if I end up agreeing with his changes, would prefer to hold them off > until after the tmpfs fallocation mods are in - other work which > had to yield to higher priorities, ready but not yet commented.) OK, I shall forget all about that followup series this time around. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>