On 10/17/22 at 05:06pm, Christophe Leroy wrote: > Hi Baoquan, > > Le 17/10/2022 à 02:37, Baoquan He a écrit : > > Hi Christophe, > > > > On 10/12/22 at 12:09pm, Christophe Leroy wrote: > >> From: > >> > >> As proposed in the discussion related to your series, here comes an > >> exemple of how it could be. > >> > >> I have taken it into ARC and IA64 architectures as an exemple. This is > >> untested, even not compiled, it is just to illustrated my meaning in the > >> discussion. > >> > >> I also added a patch for powerpc architecture, that one in tested with > >> both pmac32_defconfig and ppc64_le_defconfig. > >> > >> From my point of view, this different approach provide less churn and > >> less intellectual disturbance than the way you do it. > > > > Yes, I agree, and admire your insistence on the thing you think right or > > better. Learn from you. > > > > When you suggested this in my v2 post, I made a draft patch at below link > > according to your suggestion to request people to review. What worried > > me is that I am not sure it's ignored or disliked after one week of > > waiting. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YwtND%2FL8xD+ViN3r@MiWiFi-R3L-srv/#related > > > > Up to now, seems people don't oppose this generic_ioremap_prot() way, we > > can take it. So what's your plan? You want me to continue with your > > patches wrapped in, or I can leave it to you if you want to take over? > > I don't plan to steal your work. If you feel confortable with my > proposal, feel free to continue with it and amplify it. You have done > most of the job, you have a clear view of all subtilities in the > different architectures, so please continue, I don't plan to take over > the good work you've done until now. > > The only purpose of my series was to illustrate my comments and convince > myself it was a possible way, nothing more. Thanks a lot for all these you have done, I will post another version with the introducing generic_ioremap_prot() way you suggesed.
