Re: [PATCH] mm/huge_memory: don't clear active swapcache entry from page->private

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 04:39:23PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:06:02PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > If a swap cache resident hugepage is passed into
> > __split_huge_page(), the tail pages are incrementally split off and
> > each offset in the swap cache covered by the hugepage is updated to
> > point to the associated subpage instead of the original head page.
> > As a final step, each subpage is individually passed to
> > free_page_and_swap_cache() to free the associated swap cache entry
> > and release the page. This eventually lands in
> > delete_from_swap_cache(), which refers to page->private for the
> > swp_entry_t, which in turn encodes the swap address space and page
> > offset information.
> > 
> > The problem here is that the earlier call to
> > __split_huge_page_tail() clears page->private of each tail page in
> > the hugepage. This means that the swap entry passed to
> > __delete_from_swap_cache() is zeroed, resulting in a bogus address
> > space and offset tuple for the swapcache update. If DEBUG_VM is
> > enabled, this results in a BUG() in the latter function upon
> > detection of the old value in the swap address space not matching
> > the page being removed.
> > 
> > The ramifications are less clear if DEBUG_VM is not enabled. In the
> > particular stress-ng workload that reproduces this problem, this
> > reliably occurs via MADV_PAGEOUT, which eventually triggers swap
> > cache reclaim before the madvise() call returns. The swap cache
> > reclaim sequence attempts to reuse the entry that should have been
> > freed by the delete operation, but since that failed to correctly
> > update the swap address space, swap cache reclaim attempts to look
> > up the already freed page still stored at said offset and falls into
> > a tight loop in find_get_page() -> __filemap_get_folio() due to
> > repetitive folio_try_get_rcu() (reference count update) failures.
> > This leads to a soft lockup BUG and never seems to recover.
> > 
> > To avoid this problem, update __split_huge_page_tail() to not clear
> > page->private when the associated page has the swap cache flag set.
> > Note that this flag is transferred to the tail page by the preceding
> > ->flags update.
> > 
> > Fixes: b653db77350c7 ("mm: Clear page->private when splitting or migrating a page")
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> stable@ ?
> 

Ok.

> > ---
> > 
> > Original bug report is here [1]. I figure there's probably at least a
> > couple different ways to fix this problem, but I started with what
> > seemed most straightforward. Thoughts appreciated..
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/YxDyZLfBdFHK1Y1P@bfoster/
> > 
> >  mm/huge_memory.c | 3 ++-
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > index e9414ee57c5b..c2ddbb81a743 100644
> > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> > @@ -2445,7 +2445,8 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail,
> >  			page_tail);
> >  	page_tail->mapping = head->mapping;
> >  	page_tail->index = head->index + tail;
> > -	page_tail->private = 0;
> > +	if (!PageSwapCache(page_tail))
> > +		page_tail->private = 0;
> 
> The patch looks good to me, but this check deserves a comment.
> 

Sure... not sure how descriptive a comment you're looking for. Something
like the following perhaps?

"If the hugepage is in swapcache, page_tail->private tracks the
swap_entry_t of the tail page. We can't clear it until the tail page is
removed from swapcache."

I'll wait a bit for any further comment on Andrew's question [1] in the
thread for the issue reported by Oleksandr (which so far also appears to
be resolved by this patch). Barring further feedback, I'll plan a v2
that includes something like the above.

> Otherwise:
> 
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Thanks!

Brian

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221017152423.37a126325b4330e71cf8f869@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

> >  
> >  	/* Page flags must be visible before we make the page non-compound. */
> >  	smp_wmb();
> > -- 
> > 2.37.1
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
>   Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux