[PATCH] mm,hugetlb: take hugetlb_lock before decrementing h->resv_huge_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The h->*_huge_pages counters are protected by the hugetlb_lock, but
alloc_huge_page has a corner case where it can decrement the counter
outside of the lock.

This could lead to a corrupted value of h->resv_huge_pages, which we
have observed on our systems.

Take the hugetlb_lock before decrementing h->resv_huge_pages to avoid
a potential race.

Fixes: a88c76954804 ("mm: hugetlb: fix hugepage memory leak caused by wrong reserve count")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen McCready <gkmccready@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index b586cdd75930..dede0337c07c 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -2924,11 +2924,11 @@ struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		page = alloc_buddy_huge_page_with_mpol(h, vma, addr);
 		if (!page)
 			goto out_uncharge_cgroup;
+		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 		if (!avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, gbl_chg)) {
 			SetHPageRestoreReserve(page);
 			h->resv_huge_pages--;
 		}
-		spin_lock_irq(&hugetlb_lock);
 		list_add(&page->lru, &h->hugepage_activelist);
 		set_page_refcounted(page);
 		/* Fall through */
-- 
2.37.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux