On Mon, 26 Sep 2022 16:06:08 +0300 Anatoly Pugachev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 8:03 PM Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 05:44:56PM +0300, Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > reverting this patch makes my sparc64 box boot successfully. > > > > The failed address falls into vmmemmap region (per your boot log > > output). It looks like the respective page/folio (of init_net struct) is > > unbacked there (and likely folio_test_slab fails dereferencing ->flags). > > > > Would you mind sharing your kernel's config? > > (I'm most curious about CONFIG_SPARSMEM_VMEMMAP, I'm not familiar with > > your arch at all though.) > > mator@ttip:~/dmesg$ zcat config-6.0.0-rc6-00010-gb7f0f527dc3c.gz | grep VMEMMAP > CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE=y > CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=y > > I do upload config and boot logs to > https://github.com/mator/sparc64-dmesg > > building a new kernel version/releases as 'make olddefconfig && make -j' > current version of booted 6.0.0-rc6 is available as > https://github.com/mator/sparc64-dmesg/blob/master/config-6.0.0-rc6-00010-gb7f0f527dc3c.gz Forgive my uniformed chime-in but Linus seemed happy with the size of -rc7 and now I'm worried there won't be an -rc8. AFAICT this is a 6.0 regression. Vasily, Shakeel, do we have a plan to fix this?
