On 9/23/22 1:37 PM, Huang, Ying wrote: > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> This patch adds /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/ where all memory tier >> related details can be found. All allocated memory tiers will be listed >> there as /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/ >> >> The nodes which are part of a specific memory tier can be listed via >> /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/nodes > > It appears that XXXs is used for mask while XXXs_list is used for list? > For example, > > # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus > 0,00100004 > # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus_list > 2,20 > > It's better to follow the this convention? > That is not followed in other parts of the kernel. I was loking at cpuset $cat cpuset.cpus.effective 0-7 >> A directory hierarchy looks like >> :/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering$ tree memory_tier4/ >> memory_tier4/ >> ├── nodes >> ├── subsystem -> ../../../../bus/memory_tiering >> └── uevent >> >> :/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering$ cat memory_tier4/nodes >> 0,2 >> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Best Regards, > Huang, Ying > > [snip]
