On 2022/9/20 20:07, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 20.09.22 04:51, Liu Shixin wrote: >> Since there is nothing to do with ipc, it is strange to use IPC_CALLBACK_PRI >> here. Replace IPC_CALLBACK_PRI with MM_BATCH_CALLBACK_PRI for easy reading. > > Should this better be called MM_COMPUTE_BATCH_CALLBACK_PRI > > Not so sure if "CALLBACK" is really the right term to use here in general ... we're talking about the memory notifier priority. > "CALLBACK" is not mandatory. Just for the sake of being consistent with other macros. MM_COMPUTE_BATCH_CALLBACK_PRI is too long, maybe reduce to MM_COMPUTE_BATCH_PRI is better. Thanks,
