On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 23:44 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 21:44 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > I suspect that they right thing would be to have a way to set explicit > > nesting rules, not tied to speficic call trace. > > See might_lock() / might_lock_read(), these are used to implement > might_fault(), which is used to annotate paths that could -- but rarely > do -- fault. This will of course result in a specific trace, but if you do it early enough the trace points to your setup function, which can contain a comment explaining things. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href