Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: lockdep annotate root inode properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 01:02:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

 > >  ======================================================
 > >  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 > >  3.3.0-rc4+ #190 Not tainted
 > >  -------------------------------------------------------
 > >  shared/1568 is trying to acquire lock:
 > >   (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811efa0f>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x7d/0x108
 > > 
 > >  but task is already holding lock:
 > >   (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810f5589>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0xd4/0x12f
 > > 
 > >  which lock already depends on the new lock.
 > > 
  > 
 > Why have these lockdep warnings started coming out now - was the VFS
 > changed to newly take i_mutex somewhere in the directory handling?

This has been happening for almost a year!
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/15/272
See also https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/16/498

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]