On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:40:04 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > hm, with my gcc it's beneficial to cache `current' in a local. But > > when I tried that, Weird Things happened, because gcc has gone and > > decided to inline __sync_task_rss_stat() into its callers. I don't see > > how that could have been the right thing to do. > > > > c06b1fca18c3 offers some advice :) But is it right? I handled a patch a month or two ago where caching current made a nice improvement. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>