[PATCH v3 10/12] btrfs: make balance_dirty_pages nowait compatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This replaces the call to function balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() in
the function btrfs_buffered_write() with a call to
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags().

It also moves the function after the again label. This can cause the
function to be called a bit later, but this should have no impact in the
real world.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <shr@xxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/file.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
index 3d038e1257f9..4dc6484ff229 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
@@ -1654,6 +1654,7 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 	loff_t old_isize = i_size_read(inode);
 	unsigned int ilock_flags = 0;
 	const bool nowait = iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT;
+	unsigned int bdp_flags = nowait ? BDP_ASYNC : 0;
 
 	if (nowait)
 		ilock_flags |= BTRFS_ILOCK_TRY;
@@ -1756,6 +1757,10 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 
 		release_bytes = reserve_bytes;
 again:
+		ret = balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags(inode->i_mapping, bdp_flags);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+
 		/*
 		 * This is going to setup the pages array with the number of
 		 * pages we want, so we don't really need to worry about the
@@ -1860,8 +1865,6 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
 
 		cond_resched();
 
-		balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(inode->i_mapping);
-
 		pos += copied;
 		num_written += copied;
 	}
-- 
2.30.2






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux