Le 01/09/2022 à 19:35, Suren Baghdasaryan a écrit :
> free_pgtables and unmap_page_range functions can be called with mmap_lock
> held for write (e.g. in mmap_region), held for read (e.g in
> madvise_pageout) or not held at all (e.g in madvise_remove might
> drop mmap_lock before calling vfs_fallocate, which ends up calling
> unmap_page_range).
> Provide free_pgtables and unmap_page_range with additional argument
> indicating whether to mark the VMA as locked or not based on the usage.
> The parameter is set based on whether mmap_lock is held in write mode
> during the call. This ensures no change in behavior between mmap_lock
> and per-vma locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 +-
> mm/internal.h | 4 ++--
> mm/memory.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> mm/mmap.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++-
> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 476bf936c5f0..dc72be923e5b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1874,7 +1874,7 @@ void zap_vma_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> unsigned long size);
> void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *start_vma,
> - unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lock_vma);
>
> struct mmu_notifier_range;
>
> diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> index 785409805ed7..e6c0f999e0cb 100644
> --- a/mm/internal.h
> +++ b/mm/internal.h
> @@ -85,14 +85,14 @@ bool __folio_end_writeback(struct folio *folio);
> void deactivate_file_folio(struct folio *folio);
>
> void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *start_vma,
> - unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling);
> + unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling, bool lock_vma);
> void pmd_install(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd, pgtable_t *pte);
>
> struct zap_details;
> void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> - struct zap_details *details);
> + struct zap_details *details, bool lock_vma);
>
> void page_cache_ra_order(struct readahead_control *, struct file_ra_state *,
> unsigned int order);
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 4ba73f5aa8bb..9ac9944e8c62 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ void free_pgd_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> }
>
> void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling)
> + unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling, bool lock_vma)
> {
> while (vma) {
> struct vm_area_struct *next = vma->vm_next;
> @@ -413,6 +413,8 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * Hide vma from rmap and truncate_pagecache before freeing
> * pgtables
> */
> + if (lock_vma)
> + vma_mark_locked(vma);
> unlink_anon_vmas(vma);
> unlink_file_vma(vma);
>
> @@ -427,6 +429,8 @@ void free_pgtables(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> && !is_vm_hugetlb_page(next)) {
> vma = next;
> next = vma->vm_next;
> + if (lock_vma)
> + vma_mark_locked(vma);
> unlink_anon_vmas(vma);
> unlink_file_vma(vma);
> }
> @@ -1631,12 +1635,16 @@ static inline unsigned long zap_p4d_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
> - struct zap_details *details)
> + struct zap_details *details,
> + bool lock_vma)
> {
> pgd_t *pgd;
> unsigned long next;
>
> BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> + if (lock_vma)
> + vma_mark_locked(vma);
I'm wondering if that is really needed here.
The following processing is only dealing with the page table entries.
Today, if that could be called without holding the mmap_lock, that should
be safe to not mark the VMA locked (indeed the VMA itself is not impacted).
Thus unmap_single_vma() below no need to be touched, and its callers.
In the case a locking is required, I think there is a real potential issue
in the current kernel.
> +
> tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
> pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
> do {
> @@ -1652,7 +1660,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr,
> unsigned long end_addr,
> - struct zap_details *details)
> + struct zap_details *details, bool lock_vma)
> {
> unsigned long start = max(vma->vm_start, start_addr);
> unsigned long end;
> @@ -1691,7 +1699,7 @@ static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
> }
> } else
> - unmap_page_range(tlb, vma, start, end, details);
> + unmap_page_range(tlb, vma, start, end, details, lock_vma);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1715,7 +1723,7 @@ static void unmap_single_vma(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> */
> void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start_addr,
> - unsigned long end_addr)
> + unsigned long end_addr, bool lock_vma)
> {
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> struct zap_details details = {
> @@ -1728,7 +1736,8 @@ void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> start_addr, end_addr);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next)
> - unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, &details);
> + unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, &details,
> + lock_vma);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> }
>
> @@ -1753,7 +1762,7 @@ void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> update_hiwater_rss(vma->vm_mm);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < range.end; vma = vma->vm_next)
> - unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, start, range.end, NULL);
> + unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, start, range.end, NULL, false);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> }
> @@ -1768,7 +1777,7 @@ void zap_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
> * The range must fit into one VMA.
> */
> static void zap_page_range_single(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> - unsigned long size, struct zap_details *details)
> + unsigned long size, struct zap_details *details, bool lock_vma)
> {
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> struct mmu_gather tlb;
> @@ -1779,7 +1788,7 @@ static void zap_page_range_single(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr
> tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, vma->vm_mm);
> update_hiwater_rss(vma->vm_mm);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> - unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, address, range.end, details);
> + unmap_single_vma(&tlb, vma, address, range.end, details, lock_vma);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> }
> @@ -1802,7 +1811,7 @@ void zap_vma_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> !(vma->vm_flags & VM_PFNMAP))
> return;
>
> - zap_page_range_single(vma, address, size, NULL);
> + zap_page_range_single(vma, address, size, NULL, true);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(zap_vma_ptes);
>
> @@ -3483,7 +3492,8 @@ static void unmap_mapping_range_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long start_addr, unsigned long end_addr,
> struct zap_details *details)
> {
> - zap_page_range_single(vma, start_addr, end_addr - start_addr, details);
> + zap_page_range_single(vma, start_addr, end_addr - start_addr, details,
> + false);
> }
>
> static inline void unmap_mapping_range_tree(struct rb_root_cached *root,
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 121544fd90de..094678b4434b 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ core_param(ignore_rlimit_data, ignore_rlimit_data, bool, 0644);
>
> static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *prev,
> - unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lock_vma);
>
> static pgprot_t vm_pgprot_modify(pgprot_t oldprot, unsigned long vm_flags)
> {
> @@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> vma->vm_file = NULL;
>
> /* Undo any partial mapping done by a device driver. */
> - unmap_region(mm, vma, prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
> + unmap_region(mm, vma, prev, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, true);
> if (vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> mapping_unmap_writable(file->f_mapping);
> free_vma:
> @@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ static void remove_vma_list(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> */
> static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *prev,
> - unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> + unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lock_vma)
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *next = vma_next(mm, prev);
> struct mmu_gather tlb;
> @@ -2634,9 +2634,10 @@ static void unmap_region(struct mm_struct *mm,
> lru_add_drain();
> tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm);
> update_hiwater_rss(mm);
> - unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, start, end);
> + unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, start, end, lock_vma);
> free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, prev ? prev->vm_end : FIRST_USER_ADDRESS,
> - next ? next->vm_start : USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
> + next ? next->vm_start : USER_PGTABLES_CEILING,
> + lock_vma);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> }
>
> @@ -2849,7 +2850,7 @@ int __do_munmap(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, size_t len,
> if (downgrade)
> mmap_write_downgrade(mm);
>
> - unmap_region(mm, vma, prev, start, end);
> + unmap_region(mm, vma, prev, start, end, !downgrade);
>
> /* Fix up all other VM information */
> remove_vma_list(mm, vma);
> @@ -3129,8 +3130,8 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> tlb_gather_mmu_fullmm(&tlb, mm);
> /* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */
> /* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
> - unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
> - free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING);
> + unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1, true);
> + free_pgtables(&tlb, vma, FIRST_USER_ADDRESS, USER_PGTABLES_CEILING, true);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
>
> /* Walk the list again, actually closing and freeing it. */
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 3c6cf9e3cd66..6ffa7c511aa3 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -549,7 +549,8 @@ bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> ret = false;
> continue;
> }
> - unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, range.start, range.end, NULL);
> + unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, range.start, range.end,
> + NULL, false);
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> }
I'm wondering if the VMA locking should be done here instead of inside
unmap_page_range() which is not really touching the VMA's fields.
Here this would be needed because the page fault handler may check the
MMF_UNSTABLE flag and the VMA's locking before this loop is entered by
another thread.
