On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:04:22PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> +static int arm_iommu_mmap_attrs(struct device *dev, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + void *cpu_addr, dma_addr_t dma_addr, size_t size,
> + struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +{
> + struct arm_vmregion *c;
> +
> + vma->vm_page_prot = __get_dma_pgprot(attrs, vma->vm_page_prot);
> + c = arm_vmregion_find(&consistent_head, (unsigned long)cpu_addr);
What protects this against other insertions/removals from the list?
> +
> + if (c) {
> + struct page **pages = c->priv;
> +
> + unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
> + unsigned long usize = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
> + int i = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = vm_insert_page(vma, uaddr, pages[i++]);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("Remapping memory, error: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + uaddr += PAGE_SIZE;
> + usize -= PAGE_SIZE;
> + } while (usize > 0);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * free a page as defined by the above mapping.
> + * Must not be called with IRQs disabled.
> + */
> +void arm_iommu_free_attrs(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> + dma_addr_t handle, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
> +{
> + struct arm_vmregion *c;
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> +
> + c = arm_vmregion_find(&consistent_head, (unsigned long)cpu_addr);
What protects this against other insertions/removals from the list?
> + if (c) {
> + struct page **pages = c->priv;
> + __dma_free_remap(cpu_addr, size);
> + __iommu_remove_mapping(dev, handle, size);
> + __iommu_free_buffer(dev, pages, size);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Map a part of the scatter-gather list into contiguous io address space
> + */
> +static int __map_sg_chunk(struct device *dev, struct scatterlist *sg,
> + size_t size, dma_addr_t *handle,
> + enum dma_data_direction dir)
> +{
> + struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = dev->archdata.mapping;
> + dma_addr_t iova, iova_base;
> + int ret = 0;
> + unsigned int count;
> + struct scatterlist *s;
> +
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> + *handle = ARM_DMA_ERROR;
> +
> + iova_base = iova = __alloc_iova(mapping, size);
> + if (iova == ARM_DMA_ERROR)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (count = 0, s = sg; count < (size >> PAGE_SHIFT); s = sg_next(s))
> + {
> + phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(sg_page(s));
> + unsigned int len = PAGE_ALIGN(s->offset + s->length);
> +
> + if (!arch_is_coherent())
> + __dma_page_cpu_to_dev(sg_page(s), s->offset, s->length, dir);
> +
> + ret = iommu_map(mapping->domain, iova, phys, len, 0);
Dealing with phys addresses on one part and pages + offset + length
in a different part doesn't look like a good idea. Why can't there
be some consistency?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>