On 03/04/2012 04:10 AM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Glauber Costa<glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/03/2012 01:38 PM, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
Another possible example might be the skb data, which are just kmalloc
and are already accounted by your TCP accounting changes, so we might
not want to account them a second time.
How so?
struct sk_buff *__alloc_skb(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_mask,
int fclone, int node)
{
[ ... ]
cache = fclone ? skbuff_fclone_cache : skbuff_head_cache;
/* Get the HEAD */
skb = kmem_cache_alloc_node(cache, gfp_mask& ~__GFP_DMA, node);
Just a few lines below:
data = kmalloc_node_track_caller(size, gfp_mask, node);
-- Suleiman
Can't we just make sure those come from the root cgroup's slabs?
Then we need no flag.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>