Re: [linux-next:master 2262/4736] drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c:19: warning: expecting prototype for drivers/extcon/extcon-tusb320.c(). Prototype was for TUSB320_REG8() instead

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/3/22 01:21, kernel test robot wrote:
tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head:   e47eb90a0a9ae20b82635b9b99a8d0979b757ad8
commit: 822a6200734c94ccbfc9ae7acc5da5505b991515 [2262/4736] extcon: usbc-tusb320: Add USB TYPE-C support
config: x86_64-randconfig-a003 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220903/202209030755.eB4SkwGE-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
         # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=822a6200734c94ccbfc9ae7acc5da5505b991515
         git remote add linux-next https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
         git fetch --no-tags linux-next master
         git checkout 822a6200734c94ccbfc9ae7acc5da5505b991515
         # save the config file
         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
         COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/extcon/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c:19: warning: expecting prototype for drivers/extcon/extcon-tusb320.c(). Prototype was for TUSB320_REG8() instead


vim +19 drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c

     18	
   > 19	#define TUSB320_REG8				0x8
     20	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_ADVERTISE	GENMASK(7, 6)
     21	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_ADVERTISE_USB	0x0
     22	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_ADVERTISE_15A	0x1
     23	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_ADVERTISE_30A	0x2
     24	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_DETECT	GENMASK(5, 4)
     25	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_DETECT_DEF	0x0
     26	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_DETECT_MED	0x1
     27	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_DETECT_ACC	0x2
     28	#define TUSB320_REG8_CURRENT_MODE_DETECT_HI	0x3
     29	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACCESSORY_CONNECTED	GENMASK(3, 2)
     30	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACCESSORY_CONNECTED_NONE	0x0
     31	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACCESSORY_CONNECTED_AUDIO	0x4
     32	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACCESSORY_CONNECTED_ACC	0x5
     33	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACCESSORY_CONNECTED_DEBUG	0x6
     34	#define TUSB320_REG8_ACTIVE_CABLE_DETECTION	BIT(0)
     35	

I still believe this is a false positive, is it not ?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux