Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: add pageblock_aligned() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 2022/9/2 17:04, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.09.22 11:02, Kefeng Wang wrote:
On 2022/9/2 16:42, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 02.09.22 08:47, Kefeng Wang wrote:
Add pageblock_aligned() and use it to simplify code.

Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]

-	unsigned long nr_pgmask = pageblock_nr_pages - 1;
  	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
  	unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
  	int zid = zone_idx(zone);
@@ -1977,7 +1974,7 @@ static unsigned long  __init deferred_init_pages(struct zone *zone,
  		if (!deferred_pfn_valid(pfn)) {
  			page = NULL;
  			continue;
-		} else if (!page || !(pfn & nr_pgmask)) {
I didn't sleep too well this night and am tired, please tell me why I'm
wrong :)
Wish you have a good reset :)
Thanks, the headache isn't helping :D

"pfn & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1)" is true if the pageblock is not aligned

E.g., pfn = 1, pageblock_nr_pages = 512

pfn & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1)
-> 1 & (512 - 1)
-> 1 & 511
-> true

"!(pfn & (pageblock_nr_pages - 1))" is true if the pageblock is aligned
-> !(true)
-> false


However, "!pageblock_aligned(1)" = true


+		} else if (!page || !pageblock_aligned(pfn)) {
pageblock_aligned(pfn) IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)(pfn), pageblock_nr_pages)

#define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0) (((pfn) &
(pageblock_nr_pages - 1)) == 0) -> ((1 & 512 -1) == 0) -> ((1 & 511) ==
0) -> ((511) == 0) -> false
right ?
yes ... and inverting that would give you "true", which is not what we want?

oops...  it's my fault, looks like I need to have a reset to save my brain...
Again, sorry if I'm wrong ...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux