Re: [PATCH 1/7] mm/hugetlb: add folio support to hugetlb specific flag macros

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/29/22 8:33 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 04:00:08PM -0700, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
  #define TESTHPAGEFLAG(uname, flname)				\
+static __always_inline								\
+int folio_test_hugetlb_##flname(struct folio *folio)		\
One change I made was to have folio_test_foo() return bool instead of
int.  It helps the compiler really understand what's going on.  Maybe
some humans too ;-)


I went with returning an int to stay consistent with the page version
of the macros which return an int. I'm fine with changing it to return
a bool.

+	{	void **private = &folio->private;		\
+		return test_bit(HPG_##flname, (void *)((unsigned long)private));	\
I've made this tricky for you by making folio->private a void * instead
of the unsigned long in page.  Would this look better as ...

	{							\
		void *private = &folio->private;		\
		return test_bit(HPG_##flname, private);		\

perhaps?

Ya this looks much better and passes the tests, will add to v2.







[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux