On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 07:17:06PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 26.08.22 17:03, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 10:34:15AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> >>
> >> Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 11:49:05AM +1000, Alistair Popple wrote:
> >>>> Commit ab09243aa95a ("mm/migrate.c: remove MIGRATE_PFN_LOCKED") changed
> >>>> the way trylock_page() in migrate_vma_collect_pmd() works without
> >>>> updating the comment. Reword the comment to be less misleading and a
> >>>> better reflection of what happens.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Reported-by: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Fixes: ab09243aa95a ("mm/migrate.c: remove MIGRATE_PFN_LOCKED")
> >>>> ---
> >>>> mm/migrate_device.c | 8 +++++---
> >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate_device.c b/mm/migrate_device.c
> >>>> index 5052093d0262..0736f846de0b 100644
> >>>> --- a/mm/migrate_device.c
> >>>> +++ b/mm/migrate_device.c
> >>>> @@ -179,9 +179,11 @@ static int migrate_vma_collect_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
> >>>> get_page(page);
> >>>>
> >>>> /*
> >>>> - * Optimize for the common case where page is only mapped once
> >>>> - * in one process. If we can lock the page, then we can safely
> >>>> - * set up a special migration page table entry now.
> >>>> + * If we can't lock the page we can't migrate it. If we can it's
> >>>> + * safe to set up a migration entry now. In the common case
> >>>> + * where the page is mapped once in a single process setting up
> >>>> + * the migration entry now is an optimisation to avoid walking
> >>>> + * the rmap later with try_to_migrate().
> >>>> */
> >>>
> >>> IMHO the last sentence can still be a bit confusing - here we 100% rely on
> >>> the trylock() to proceed or we'll stop migration right away. IMHO that
> >>> means this is not an optimization, since optimizations should always be
> >>> optional but not the case here.
> >>
> >> We have to lock the page here, we don't have to install the migration
> >> entries. Installing the migration entries here is optional and is the
> >> optimisation.
> >
> > I see what you mean now.
> >
> >>
> >>> Meanwhile it'll be great to also mention about why trylock is needed and no
> >>> further attempt to use lock_page(). The comment in prepare() previously
> >>> was great but unfortunately that code clip was removed.
> >>
> >> Will add.
> >>
> >>> In short, do you think something like this might be clearer?
> >>
> >> I think it's important to mention the optimisation, otherwise the
> >> temptation is to remove the installation of migration entries here and
> >> rely on try_to_migrate() to do it later. I would actually like to be
> >> able to do that because it simplifies the code in many ways but based on
> >> my testing the optimisation turns out to be very worth while.
> >>
> >>> /*
> >>> * We rely on the trylock() to migrate the pte. If this
> >>> * fails, we'll fail the migration of this page. IOW, the
> >>> * migration is very much best-effort, just like we'll also
> >>> * bail out if we found page pinned by other users after
> >>> * page being locked.
> >>
> >> Honestly I think this describes what the code does rather than why and
> >> is likely to become outdated and confusing. IMHO it's quite clear from
> >> the code that the migration will fail here if we can't lock the page.
> >
> > If you see that's what I was struggling to understand previously, so not
> > clear at least to me. :) Since normally a function like page migration
> > should (from the gut feeling) not rely on trylock only.
>
> IIRC, ordinary page migration will also only trylock. See
> isolate_movable_page().
Fair enough.
I think it depends on what we want to do with the migration. I think not
even all users of isolate_movable_page() only depend on trylock, and it can
retry with lock_page later. E.g.:
- soft_offline_in_use_page
- isolate_page
- isolate_movable_page <----- trylock here
- (if isolate_page fails...) migrate_pages
- unmap_and_move <----- lock_page here after 2 unsuccessful rounds
And I also agree migration may always fail (e.g. by spurious page refcounts
being taken), so feel free to ignore the "gut feeling" - that's indeed kind
of subjective.
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
