RE: [PATCH Part2 v6 02/49] iommu/amd: Introduce function to check SEV-SNP support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Hello Jarkko,

>> 
>> It really should be, in order to have any practical use:
>> 
>> 	if (no_iommu) {
>> 		pr_err("SEV-SNP: IOMMU is disabled.\n");
>> 		return false;
>> 	}
>> 
>> 	if (iommu_default_passthrough()) {
>> 		pr_err("SEV-SNP: IOMMU is configured in passthrough mode.\n");
>> 		return false;
>> 	}
>> 
>> The comment is *completely* redundant, it absolutely does not serve 
>> any sane purpose. It just tells what the code already clearly stating.
>> 
>> The combo error message on the other hand leaves you to the question 
>> "which one was it", and for that reason combining the checks leaves 
>> you to a louse debugging experience.

>Also, are those really *errors*? That implies that there is something wrong.

>Since you can have a legit configuration, IMHO they should be either warn or info. What do you think?

>They are definitely not errors

Yes, they can be warn or info, but as I mentioned above this patch is now part of IOMMU + SNP series,
so these comments are now relevant for that.

Thanks,
Ashish





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux