Re: [PATCH -next] slub: set PG_slab on all of slab pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Namhyung Kim wrote:

> > You cannot free a tail page of a compound higher order page independently.
> > You must free the whole compound.
> >
>
> I meant freeing a *slab object* resides in a compound page using buddy
> system API (e.g. free_pages). I know it's definitely a programming
> error. However there's no safety net to protect and/or warn such a
> misbehavior AFAICS - except for head page which has PG_slab set - when
> it happened by any chance.

?? One generally passed a struct page pointer to the page allocator. Slab
allocator takes pointers to object. The calls that take a pointer to an
object must have a page aligned value.

> Without it, it might be possible to free part of tail pages silently,
> and cause unexpected not-so-funny results some time later. It should be
> hard to find out.

Ok then fix the page allocator to BUG() on tail pages. That is an issue
with the page allocator not the slab allocator.

Adding PG_tail to the flags checked on free should do the trick (at least
for 64 bit).

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]