Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/damon: validate if the pmd entry is present before accessing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 15:37:43 +0800 Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The pmd_huge() is used to validate if the pmd entry is mapped by a huge
> page, also including the case of non-present (migration or hwpoisoned)
> pmd entry on arm64 or x86 architectures. That means the pmd_pfn() can
> not get the correct pfn number for the non-present pmd entry, which
> will cause damon_get_page() to get an incorrect page struct (also
> may be NULL by pfn_to_online_page()) to make the access statistics
> incorrect.
> 
> Moreover it does not make sense that we still waste time to get the
> page of the non-present entry, just treat it as not-accessed and skip it,
> that keeps consistent with non-present pte level entry.
> 
> Thus adding a pmd entry present validation to fix above issues.
> 

Do we have a Fixes: for this?

What are the user-visible runtime effects of the bug?  "make the access
statistics incorrect" is rather vague.

Do we feel that a cc:stable is warranted?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux