Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCHv23 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal,

2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/23 Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>>> This is (yet another) quick update of CMA patches. I've rebased them
>>> onto next-20120222 tree from
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git and
>>> fixed the bug pointed by Aaro Koskinen.
>>
>>
>> For the whole series:
>>
>> Tested-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:
>
>
> Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or
> similar)?

i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed
in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA
to users who want to use cma. i also think we should have a seperate
document to explain cma in details in documents/, and my helper
program can be placed there.

how do you think?
>
> --
> Best regards,                                         _     _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of      o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science,  Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz    (o o)
> ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--

thanks
barry

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]