On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 06:11:18PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
> On 2022/8/16 17:16, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 04:44:26PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> > > From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The page on pcplist could be used, but not counted into memory free or
> > > avaliable, and pcp_free is only showed by show_mem(). Since commit
> > > d8a759b57035 ("mm, page_alloc: double zone's batchsize"), there is a
> > > significant decrease in the display of free memory, with a large number
> > > of cpus and nodes, the number of pages in the percpu list can be very
> > > large, so it is better to let user to know the pcp count.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/base/node.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > > fs/proc/meminfo.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> > > index eb0f43784c2b..846864e45db6 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> > > @@ -375,6 +375,9 @@ static ssize_t node_read_meminfo(struct device *dev,
> > > struct sysinfo i;
> > > unsigned long sreclaimable, sunreclaimable;
> > > unsigned long swapcached = 0;
> > > + unsigned long free_pcp = 0;
> > > + struct zone *zone;
> > > + int cpu;
> > > si_meminfo_node(&i, nid);
> > > sreclaimable = node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B);
> > > @@ -382,9 +385,17 @@ static ssize_t node_read_meminfo(struct device *dev,
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
> > > swapcached = node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SWAPCACHE);
> > > #endif
> > > + for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> > > + if (zone_to_nid(zone) != nid)
> > > + continue;
> > > + for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
> > > + free_pcp += per_cpu_ptr(zone->per_cpu_pageset, cpu)->count;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > len = sysfs_emit_at(buf, len,
> > > "Node %d MemTotal: %8lu kB\n"
> > > "Node %d MemFree: %8lu kB\n"
> > > + "Node %d PcpFree: %8lu kB\n"
> > First off, this sysfs file is a huge violation of the normal sysfs
> > rules, so I will not allow any new entries to be added. In fact, the
> > whole thing should just be removed and multiple files created in its
> > place.
>
> Hi Greg, do you mean to remove all /sys/devices/system/node/node*/meminfo,
>
> but this will beak ABI, is it acceptable?
I do not know, what tool relies on this file? Any userspace tool should
always be able to handle a sysfs file being removed, so you should
probably work with the tool authors to fix this up before removing it.
thanks,
gre gk-h
