A circular locking problem is reported by lockdep due to the following circular locking dependency. +--> cpu_hotplug_lock --> slab_mutex --> kn->active --+ | | +-----------------------------------------------------+ The forward cpu_hotplug_lock ==> slab_mutex ==> kn->active dependency happens in kmem_cache_destroy(): cpus_read_lock(); mutex_lock(&slab_mutex); ==> sysfs_slab_unlink() ==> kobject_del() ==> kernfs_remove() ==> __kernfs_remove() ==> kernfs_drain(): rwsem_acquire(&kn->dep_map, ...); The backward kn->active ==> cpu_hotplug_lock dependency happens in kernfs_fop_write_iter(): kernfs_get_active(); ==> slab_attr_store() ==> cpu_partial_store() ==> flush_all(): cpus_read_lock() One way to break this circular locking chain is to avoid holding cpu_hotplug_lock and slab_mutex while deleting the kobject in sysfs_slab_unlink() which should be equivalent to doing a write_lock and write_unlock pair of the kn->active virtual lock. Since the kobject structures are not protected by slab_mutex or the cpu_hotplug_lock, we can certainly release those locks before doing the delete operation. Move sysfs_slab_unlink() and sysfs_slab_release() to the newly created kmem_cache_release() and call it outside the slab_mutex & cpu_hotplug_lock critical sections. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx> --- [v2] Break kmem_cache_release() helper into 2 separate ones. mm/slab_common.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c index 17996649cfe3..7742d0446d8b 100644 --- a/mm/slab_common.c +++ b/mm/slab_common.c @@ -392,6 +392,36 @@ kmem_cache_create(const char *name, unsigned int size, unsigned int align, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_create); +#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS +static void kmem_cache_workfn_release(struct kmem_cache *s) +{ + sysfs_slab_release(s); +} +#else +static void kmem_cache_workfn_release(struct kmem_cache *s) +{ + slab_kmem_cache_release(s); +} +#endif + +/* + * For a given kmem_cache, kmem_cache_destroy() should only be called + * once or there will be a use-after-free problem. The actual deletion + * and release of the kobject does not need slab_mutex or cpu_hotplug_lock + * protection. So they are now done without holding those locks. + */ +static void kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s) +{ +#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS + sysfs_slab_unlink(s); +#endif + + if (s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU) + schedule_work(&slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy_work); + else + kmem_cache_workfn_release(s); +} + static void slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy_workfn(struct work_struct *work) { LIST_HEAD(to_destroy); @@ -418,11 +448,7 @@ static void slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy_workfn(struct work_struct *work) list_for_each_entry_safe(s, s2, &to_destroy, list) { debugfs_slab_release(s); kfence_shutdown_cache(s); -#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS - sysfs_slab_release(s); -#else - slab_kmem_cache_release(s); -#endif + kmem_cache_workfn_release(s); } } @@ -437,20 +463,10 @@ static int shutdown_cache(struct kmem_cache *s) list_del(&s->list); if (s->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU) { -#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS - sysfs_slab_unlink(s); -#endif list_add_tail(&s->list, &slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy); - schedule_work(&slab_caches_to_rcu_destroy_work); } else { kfence_shutdown_cache(s); debugfs_slab_release(s); -#ifdef SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS - sysfs_slab_unlink(s); - sysfs_slab_release(s); -#else - slab_kmem_cache_release(s); -#endif } return 0; @@ -465,14 +481,16 @@ void slab_kmem_cache_release(struct kmem_cache *s) void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) { + int refcnt; + if (unlikely(!s) || !kasan_check_byte(s)) return; cpus_read_lock(); mutex_lock(&slab_mutex); - s->refcount--; - if (s->refcount) + refcnt = --s->refcount; + if (refcnt) goto out_unlock; WARN(shutdown_cache(s), @@ -481,6 +499,8 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s) out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); cpus_read_unlock(); + if (!refcnt) + kmem_cache_release(s); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmem_cache_destroy); -- 2.31.1