Re: [LKP] Re: [xfs] 016a23388c: stress-ng.xattr.ops_per_sec 58.4% improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave,

On 8/3/2022 9:02 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> That a single cacheline miss avoids all the spinlock contention is
> just pure luck - it'll come back if other work is being done on the
> machine that consumes enough memory bandwidth to push this back over
> the edge.

Agree. We did see some strange performance boost which can't be connected
to the code change. And worried later unrelated change reduce the
mysterious performance gain (and report it as regression).

Regards
Yin, Fengwei




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux