On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 4:05 PM Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > +/**
> > + * kmsan_task_exit() - Notify KMSAN that a task has exited.
> > + * @task: task about to finish.
> > + */
> > +void kmsan_task_exit(struct task_struct *task);
>
> Something went wrong with patch shuffling here I think,
> kmsan_task_create + kmsan_task_exit decls are duplicated by this
> patch.
Right, I've messed it up. Will fix.
> > +
> > +struct page_pair {
>
> 'struct shadow_origin_pages' for a more descriptive name?
How about "metadata_page_pair"?
> > + * At the very end there may be leftover blocks in held_back[]. They are
> > + * collected later by kmsan_memblock_discard().
> > + */
> > +bool kmsan_memblock_free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> > +{
> > + struct page *shadow, *origin;
>
> Can this just be 'struct page_pair'?
Not sure this is worth it. We'll save one line by assigning this
struct to held_back[order], but the call to kmsan_setup_meta() will
become more verbose.
(and passing a struct page_pair to kmsan_setup_meta() looks excessive).
> > + struct page *origin, int order)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
>
> Noticed this in many places, but we can just make these "for (int i =.." now.
Fixed here and all over the runtime.
> > @@ -1731,6 +1731,9 @@ void __init memblock_free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> > {
> > if (early_page_uninitialised(pfn))
> > return;
> > + if (!kmsan_memblock_free_pages(page, order))
> > + /* KMSAN will take care of these pages. */
> > + return;
>
> Add {} because the then-statement is not right below the if.
Done.
--
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer
Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München
Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Liana Sebastian
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
