On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:13:58AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * This should only be called upon a pfn swap entry to get the PFN stored
> > + * in the swap entry. Please refers to is_pfn_swap_entry() for definition
> > + * of pfn swap entry.
> > + */
> > +static inline unsigned long swp_offset_pfn(swp_entry_t entry)
> > +{
>
> Is it good to call is_pfn_swap_entry() here for debug that can be
> eliminated in the production kernel?
Sure, I'll add a VM_BUG_ON() there in the next spin.
>
> > + return swp_offset(entry) & SWP_PFN_MASK;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* check whether a pte points to a swap entry */
> > static inline int is_swap_pte(pte_t pte)
> > {
> > @@ -369,7 +387,7 @@ static inline int pte_none_mostly(pte_t pte)
> >
> > static inline struct page *pfn_swap_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry)
> > {
> > - struct page *p = pfn_to_page(swp_offset(entry));
> > + struct page *p = pfn_to_page(swp_offset_pfn(entry));
> >
> > /*
> > * Any use of migration entries may only occur while the
> > @@ -387,6 +405,9 @@ static inline struct page *pfn_swap_entry_to_page(swp_entry_t entry)
> > */
> > static inline bool is_pfn_swap_entry(swp_entry_t entry)
> > {
> > + /* Make sure the swp offset can always store the needed fields */
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(SWP_TYPE_SHIFT < SWP_PFN_BITS);
>
> BUILD_BUG_ON(SWP_TYPE_SHIFT <= SWP_PFN_BITS);
Logiclaly it's okay to have SWP_TYPE_SHIFT==SWP_PFN_BITS?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
