On 07/29/22 10:02, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/7/7 4:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > Create the new routine hugetlb_unmap_file_folio that will unmap a single
> > file folio. This is refactored code from hugetlb_vmdelete_list. It is
> > modified to do locking within the routine itself and check whether the
> > page is mapped within a specific vma before unmapping.
> >
> > This refactoring will be put to use and expanded upon in a subsequent
> > patch adding vma specific locking.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > index 31bd4325fce5..0eac0ea2a245 100644
> > --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > @@ -396,6 +396,94 @@ static int hugetlbfs_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Called with i_mmap_rwsem held for inode based vma maps. This makes
> > + * sure vma (and vm_mm) will not go away. We also hold the hugetlb fault
> > + * mutex for the page in the mapping. So, we can not race with page being
> > + * faulted into the vma.
> > + */
> > +static bool hugetlb_vma_maps_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long addr, struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + pte_t *ptep, pte;
> > +
> > + ptep = huge_pte_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr,
> > + huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma)));
> > +
> > + if (!ptep)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep);
> > + if (huge_pte_none(pte) || !pte_present(pte))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (pte_page(pte) == page)
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + return false; /* WTH??? */
>
> I'm sorry but what does WTH means? IIUC, this could happen if pte_page is a COW-ed private page?
> vma_interval_tree_foreach doesn't exclude the private mapping even after cow?
My apologies, I left that comment in during development and should have removed
it. WTH is an acronym for 'What the Heck?". I added it because I did not
think we should ever get to this return statement.
I am not sure if your COW of a private page would get us to this return
statement. In any case, if we get there we need to return false.
Thank you for your analysis and comments!
--
Mike Kravetz
