Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] hugetlbfs: fix inaccurate comment in hugetlbfs_statfs()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:29:18PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> In some cases, e.g. when size option is not specified, f_blocks, f_bavail
> and f_bfree will be set to -1 instead of 0. Likewise, when nr_inodes isn't
> specified, f_files and f_ffree will be set to -1 too. Update the comment
> to make this clear.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux