On 25.07.22 14:53, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 02:38:57PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> The less core-MM code to handle unaccepted memory the better. Meaning, >> that any kind of additional pre-acceptance (in addition to what we have >> here) needs good justification. > > I actually mean to have a user interface to have the core code > pre-accept. I.e., interface to what will be already there anyway. > Ah, got it. The "issue" with ordinary prefaulting in user space is that you'll also end up zeroing the memory. But yeah, it should just accept a bunch of memory. > Or is that frowned upon too? I was assuming you'd want some additional interface that only accept memory without actually temporarily allocating it. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
