On Wednesday 22 February 2012 23:03:31 Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > With this patch in place, /proc/PID/task/TID/maps are treated as 'maps > as the task would see it' and hence, only the vma that that task uses > as stack is marked as [stack]. All other 'stack' vmas are marked as > anonymous memory. /proc/PID/maps acts as a thread group level view, > where all stack vmas are marked. i don't suppose we could have it say "[tid stack]" rather than "[stack]" ? or perhaps even "[stack tid:%u]" with replacing %u with the tid ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.