On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 03:34:00PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:13:03PM +0000, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > When SEV-SNP is enabled in the guest, the hardware places restrictions on
> > all memory accesses based on the contents of the RMP table. When hardware
> > encounters RMP check failure caused by the guest memory access it raises
> > the #NPF. The error code contains additional information on the access
> > type. See the APM volume 2 for additional information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 14 +++++---
> > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > index 4ed90331bca0..7fc0fad87054 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> > @@ -4009,3 +4009,79 @@ void sev_post_unmap_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> >
> > spin_unlock(&sev->psc_lock);
> > }
> > +
> > +void handle_rmp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u64 error_code)
> > +{
> > + int rmp_level, npt_level, rc, assigned;
> > + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> > + gfn_t gfn = gpa_to_gfn(gpa);
> > + bool need_psc = false;
> > + enum psc_op psc_op;
> > + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> > + bool private;
> > +
> > + write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(vcpu, gpa, &pfn, &npt_level)))
>
> This function does not exist. Should it be kvm_mmu_get_tdp_page?
Ugh, ignore that.
This the actual issue:
$ git grep kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:bool kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, int *level)
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c:EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk);
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c: rc = kvm_mmu_get_tdp_walk(vcpu, gpa, &pfn, &npt_level);
It's not declared in any header.
BR, Jarkko
