Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 04:49:42PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote: >> return store_status(status, start, node, i - start); >> @@ -1768,8 +1768,12 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes, >> >> err = move_pages_and_store_status(mm, current_node, &pagelist, >> status, start, i, nr_pages); >> - if (err) >> + if (err) { >> + /* We have stored status of page i */ > > IMHO, "We have accounted for page i" gives a more clear statement. Sure. Will change this. > Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> Thanks! Best Regards, Huang, Ying >> + if (err > 0) >> + err--; >> goto out; >> + } >> current_node = NUMA_NO_NODE; >> } >> out_flush: >> -- >> 2.30.2 >> >>