On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 09:11:32AM +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >Konstantin Khlebnikov<khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > >Konstantin, > > > >>There complete patch-set with my lru_lock splitting > >>plus all related preparations and cleanups rebased to next-20120210 > > > >On large systems we're also seeing lock contention on the lru_lock > >without using memcgs. Any thoughts how this could be extended for this > >situation too? > > We can split lru_lock by pfn-based interleaving. > After all these cleanups it is very easy. I already have patch for this. Cool. If you send it can try it out on a large system. This would split the LRU by pfn too, correct? -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>